Greetings! My name is Andreas, and I’m a postdoc at TU Dresden. I obtained my PhD from FU Berlin as part of the Berlin School of Economics (BSoE) and am a guest researcher at DIW Berlin.
I’m an applied microeconomist specializing in labor economics and the economics of education. I combine quasi-experimental methods, large-scale data, and economic theory to understand the determinants and consequences of investments in different types of skills. Scroll down for details on my projects.
Download my CV.
Visiting Researcher, 2023
Stanford University
Ph.D. in Economics, 2019-2024
Freie Universität Berlin
M.Sc. in Economics, 2016-2019
LMU Munich and Université Paris-Saclay
B.A. in Economics, 2013-2016
University of Göttingen
Using administrative microdata on German higher education, this paper shows that economic downturns at high school graduation shift skill investment toward more applied options. High school graduates increasingly choose vocationally oriented colleges or apprenticeships over public universities. Survey data reveal that economic preferences moderate these effects: students with college-educated parents are less affected, while low-achieving young men expect higher relative returns to vocational education during recessions. These findings challenge the conventional wisdom of countercyclical college-going and suggest that investments in applied skills serve as an insurance mechanism against labor market uncertainty.
This paper investigates the long-run consequences of a later school entry for personality traits. For identification, we exploit the statutory cutoff rules for school enrollment in Germany within a regression discontinuity design. We find that relatively older school starters have persistently lower levels of neuroticism in adulthood. This effect is entirely driven by women, which has important implications for gender gaps in the labor market, as women typically score significantly higher on neuroticism at all stages of life, which puts them at a disadvantage. Our results suggest that family decisions regarding compliance with enrollment cutoffs may have lasting implications for gender gaps in socio-emotional skills.
This study asks how public information on the within-field-of-study quality distribution of universities affects college choice. We combine an ordinal tier ranking published by the German newspaper “Die Zeit” and register data on higher education students. Differences-in-differences estimates show that being ranked in the top tier increases the average distance traveled by freshmen within a program by over 7%. The results are larger in dynamic specifications and robust to controlling for the local rent level. Rankings based on recommendations by faculty are overall less effective. We discuss how information provision on program quality can affect educational mismatch and implications for inequality.
Using detailed data from a unique survey of high school graduates in Germany, we document a gender gap in expected full-time earnings of more than 15%. We decompose this early gender gap and find that especially differences in coefficients help explain different expectations. In particular, the effects of having time for family as career motive and being first-generation college student are associated with large penalties in female wage expectations exclusively. This is especially true for higher expected career paths. Resulting expected returns to education are associated with college enrollment of women and could thus entrench subsequent gaps in realized earnings.
Following a landmark court ruling in 2005, more than half of Germany’s universities started charging tuition fees, which were later abolished in a staggered manner. We exploit the fact that even students who were already enrolled had to start paying fees. We show that fees increase study effort and degree completion among these students. However, fees also decrease first-time university enrollment among high school graduates. Combining this enrollment impact with the effect on completion, we find that fees around the zero-price margin have only little effect on overall educational attainment. We conclude by discussing policies targeting the separate effect margins of fees and caution against a general abolition.